tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6471682564764584057.post6400171051302098631..comments2023-05-29T09:11:40.547-04:00Comments on Classical Photography: Waning Gibbous MoonJess Isaiah Levinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07037913907655451813noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6471682564764584057.post-88628595999426213042013-12-31T19:59:42.252-05:002013-12-31T19:59:42.252-05:00Grate photo, Jess. Beautifully done.
KenGrate photo, Jess. Beautifully done.<br /><br />KenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6471682564764584057.post-84777082438870498562013-12-29T00:06:16.260-05:002013-12-29T00:06:16.260-05:00Thank you!Thank you!Jess Isaiah Levinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07037913907655451813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6471682564764584057.post-43658801859381034942013-12-27T04:54:12.563-05:002013-12-27T04:54:12.563-05:00Whoa...excellent point! You would be a psychoanal...Whoa...excellent point! You would be a psychoanalyst's dream!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15101500916547854762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6471682564764584057.post-17365874207119428592013-12-26T18:49:06.385-05:002013-12-26T18:49:06.385-05:00Beautiful, Jess, beautiful! Not that that isn'...Beautiful, Jess, beautiful! Not that that isn't the norm when you're behind a camera....Barbhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15591916683842089588noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6471682564764584057.post-75194690843676009872013-12-26T12:39:23.514-05:002013-12-26T12:39:23.514-05:00And I thought I was just presenting a pretty pictu...And I thought I was just presenting a pretty picture! Well, I guess I did characterize the moon as "the lovely Selene".<br />:)Jess Isaiah Levinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07037913907655451813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6471682564764584057.post-66414843139242870982013-12-26T08:21:09.795-05:002013-12-26T08:21:09.795-05:00Spectacular photo, Jess! Your description of the ...Spectacular photo, Jess! Your description of the texture of the moon (and indeed, the photo is a good texture shot) reminded me of the Rorscach inkblot test. I would score your description of the photo as a T=1 and here's some good news research about the T=1 (because you provided one texture response) style:<br /><br />J Pers Assess. 2009 Nov;91(6):601-10. doi: 10.1080/00223890903230931.<br />The Rorschach texture response: a construct validation study using attachment theory.<br />Cassella MJ, Viglione DJ.<br /><br />Abstract<br /><br />Using attachment theory, in this research, we explored the construct validity of the Rorschach (Exner, 1974) Texture (T) response as a measure of interpersonal closeness and contact. A total of 40 men and 39 women completed the Rorschach and 2 attachment inventories. Their romantic partners also completed an informant version of the attachment measures. Attachment styles were measured by factor scores involving both self-report and partner report. Results indicate that attachment theory, as a broad conceptual framework, is associated with T. Specifically, T = 1 is most closely associated with a secure attachment style, T > 1 with aspects of the preoccupied style, and T = 0 with aspects of the avoidant style and an absence of secure attachment. Needs for closeness and contact associated with T can be couched within an adult attachment theory, but in this study, we did not test for problematic aspects of insecure attachment. Gender is a complicating factor and deserves more study.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15101500916547854762noreply@blogger.com